CVE-2023-40672

Sticky Social Media Icons <= 2.0 - Missing Authorization via ajax_request_handle

2023-08-21 00:00
Nguyen Xuan Chien

Strategic Overview

Status
Unpatched
Affected Version
<= 2.0
CVSS
4.3Medium
Weakness type
CWE-862 · Missing Authorization
CVE
CVE-2023-40672
View all Sticky Social Media Icons vulnerabilities

At a glance

CVE-2023-40672 is a medium-severity Missing Authorization vulnerability in the Sticky Social Media Icons WordPress plugin, affecting versions <= 2.0. It carries a CVSS score of 4.3 (reachable over the network; low attack complexity). The root cause is a missing authorization check on a reachable function. No fixed release has been reported yet; treat installations running this software as exposed. Disclosed August 2023, reported by Nguyen Xuan Chien.

Vulnerability Overview

The Sticky Social Media Icons plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized settings update due to a missing capability check on the ajax_request_handle function in versions up to, and including, 2.0. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to update the plugin's settings.

Technical Analysis

The vector marks this flaw as remotely reachable over the network, with low attack complexity — no special timing or configuration is needed, and no interaction from a victim user.

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

Reaching this weakness in Sticky Social Media Icons <= 2.0 takes a caller who can reach the endpoint. A missing authorization check means a function is reachable by anyone who can reach the endpoint, because the code never asks whether the caller is allowed to perform the action.

Any user who can reach the endpoint gets to run an action reserved for higher-privileged roles, from reading protected data to changing settings or content. No fixed build of this plugin is recorded for Sticky Social Media Icons yet, so installs running <= 2.0 stay exposed until the vendor ships one.

Remediation

No known patch available. Please review the vulnerability's details in depth and employ mitigations based on your organization's risk tolerance. It may be best to uninstall the affected software and find a replacement.

How does WordSec protect against this?

Because it turns on account access, WordSec's login security is the relevant layer: role-based two-factor, captcha and brute-force limits raise the cost of getting the account this needs. No patched version is recorded yet, which is the case where a filtering layer matters most, because there is nothing to update to.

  • Login Security
  • Alerts

External References

Vulnerability data © Defiant, Inc., provided under the Wordfence Intelligence T&C